From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
continue_at() doesn't have a return statement anymore.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/bcache/closure.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
index 1ec84ca..295b7e4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
@@ -312,8 +312,6 @@ static inline void closure_wake_up(struct closure_waitlist *list)
* been dropped with closure_put()), it will resume execution at @fn running out
* of @wq (or, if @wq is NULL, @fn will be called by closure_put() directly).
*
- * NOTE: This macro expands to a return in the calling function!
- *
* This is because after calling continue_at() you no longer have a ref on @cl,
* and whatever @cl owns may be freed out from under you - a running closure fn
* has a ref on its own closure which continue_at() drops.
@@ -340,8 +338,6 @@ do { \
* Causes @fn to be executed out of @cl, in @wq context (or called directly if
* @wq is NULL).
*
- * NOTE: like continue_at(), this macro expands to a return in the caller!
- *
* The ref the caller of continue_at_nobarrier() had on @cl is now owned by @fn,
* thus it's not safe to touch anything protected by @cl after a
* continue_at_nobarrier().
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
