On 2017/6/9 上午9:34, tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello Coly, > > > > I feel uncomfortable to the above idea. Is the purpose of this change is > > > to make writeback more efficient with more dirty data ? Or some other > > > reason that you want to make this change? > > > This patch fix for Kuba Sztandera's issue: > > "Writeback rate is at minimum 1 block per second" > > Please see more detail at his email, > > or look at this link: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg04645.html Yeah, with comments from Eric, I come to understand where the problem is. Most of people do not follow our bcache mailing list, what they can see is only patch commit log. If you may add the back ground why this is a problem and how to fix it, that will be really helpful to many people. Thanks for your effort :-) -- Coly Li -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html