Re: [PATCH] bcache: fix issue of writeback rate at minimum 1 blockper second

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017/6/9 上午9:34, tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hello Coly,
> 
> 
> > I feel uncomfortable to the above idea. Is the purpose of this change is
> 
> > to make writeback more efficient with more dirty data ? Or some other
> 
> > reason that you want to make this change?
> 
> 
> This patch fix for Kuba Sztandera's issue:
> 
> "Writeback rate is at minimum 1 block per second"
> 
> Please see more detail at his email,
> 
> or look at this link:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg04645.html

Yeah, with comments from Eric, I come to understand where the problem
is. Most of people do not follow our bcache mailing list, what they can
see is only patch commit log. If you may add the back ground why this is
a problem and how to fix it, that will be really helpful to many people.

Thanks for your effort :-)

-- 
Coly Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux