Hi Coly, thanks to your review and comments.
Commit 77b5a08427e875 ("bcache: don't embed 'return' statements in closure macros")
remove the return in continue_at(), so I think we should update the document info
about continue_at().
Thanks!
Yijing.
在 2016/6/29 18:16, Coly Li 写道:
> 在 16/6/22 上午10:12, Yijing Wang 写道:
>> There is no return in continue_at(), update the documentation.
>>
>
> There are 2 modification of this patch. The first one is about a typo,
> it is correct.
>
> But I doubt your second modification is proper. The line removed in your
> patch is,
>> - * continue_at() also, critically, is a macro that returns the
> calling function.
>> - * There's good reason for this.
>> - *
>
> I think this is exactly what original author wants to say. It does not
> mean return a value, it means return to the calling function. And the
> bellowed lines explains the reason.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/md/bcache/closure.h | 3 ---
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c
>> index 9eaf1d6..864e673 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c
>> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ bool closure_wait(struct closure_waitlist *waitlist, struct closure *cl)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(closure_wait);
>>
>> /**
>> - * closure_sync - sleep until a closure a closure has nothing left to wait on
>> + * closure_sync - sleep until a closure has nothing left to wait on
>
> Yes, this modification is good.
>
>> *
>> * Sleeps until the refcount hits 1 - the thread that's running the closure owns
>> * the last refcount.
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
>> index 782cc2c..f51188d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
>> @@ -31,9 +31,6 @@
>> * passing it, as you might expect, the function to run when nothing is pending
>> * and the workqueue to run that function out of.
>> *
>> - * continue_at() also, critically, is a macro that returns the calling function.
>> - * There's good reason for this.
>> - *
>> * To use safely closures asynchronously, they must always have a refcount while
>> * they are running owned by the thread that is running them. Otherwise, suppose
>> * you submit some bios and wish to have a function run when they all complete:
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
