Re: dm-cache performance behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:12:27PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Anyway, as Zdenek effectively: said dm-cache isn't a writecache.  If you
> need a writecache then bcache is the only option as of now.  Though
> there is an emerging DM writecache target that has stalled but can be
> revisited, see:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/snitzer/linux.git/log/?h=writecache

bcache is still more than that, it's a combined read/writeback cache :) much
like how today we only have one pagecache for both read caching and write
caching. Main trick is you need a pretty sophisticated btree to pull that off
with good performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux