On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> I'm not sure why it tried to register sdl2 then when it was already
> registered from boot. Did it time out and had to be registered again?
This is a bit ugly of a udev hack, but it prevents duplicate
registrations. I'm open to a better way if someone knows how to make udev
behave:
diff --git a/69-bcache.rules b/69-bcache.rules
index 9cc7f0d..0efb66d 100644
--- a/69-bcache.rules
+++ b/69-bcache.rules
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ ACTION=="remove", GOTO="bcache_end"
ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}=="1", GOTO="bcache_end"
KERNEL=="fd*|sr*", GOTO="bcache_end"
+IMPORT{program}="/bin/sh -c 'echo -n UDEV_PATH_ALREADY_REGISTERED=; /usr/bin/test -e /sys/$(/usr/sbin/udevadm info -n $tempnode -q path)/bcache && echo 1 || echo 0'"
+ENV{UDEV_PATH_ALREADY_REGISTERED}=="1", GOTO="bcache_end"
+
# blkid was run by the standard udev rules
# It recognised bcache (util-linux 2.24+)
ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="bcache", GOTO="bcache_backing_found"
--
Eric Wheeler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
