>>> On 4/9/2015 at 11:05 AM, in message <5525EC60.8F7 : 225 : 10347>, Lidong Zhong wrote: > Hi David, Hi Kai, I am really sorry for the wrong name :\ > I am curious about how rootfs and home share the SSD dynamically. Are they > on > the same partition? Sorry for stupid questions since I just touched bcache > recently. > > Regards, > Lidong >> cache then depending on demands. So rootfs is a bit slower as natively on >> SSD but home can gain much more because unsed parts of the rootfs are >> available for caching. >> >> The split-setup preference in turn gives you a fallback boot option in case >> bcache chokes: You still have a working rootfs to do repairs or restore >> backups. In my setup I encounter that problem with a working USB3-HD mirror >> of my system I can boot and restore from which is synced and snapshotted >> every night (so it also protects against accidental file deletion synced >> undetected into the backup). Most valuable data is stored remotely (photos, >> source code, documents, configuration, etc). > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
