Re: Using vmalloc instead of get_free_pages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Slava Pestov wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> - That the amount of memory being allocated for a single caching device
>> exceeds maximum the amount allocatable by get_free_pages(), so I changed

>As you've already noticed this is fixed in bcache-dev, but that brings in a

I already hoped it would have been, but since the ondisk format changed,
I couldn't fully confirm this yet.  I don't mind changing the on-disk format,
BTW, because I am still able to reformat the disks before the servers
go into production.

>Support for multiple cache devices is in bcache-dev, it requires changes
>to both make-bcache and the kernel. I'm not sure what the time frame for
>upstreaming this is, since the changes are more involved.

Well, I don't mind running a custom kernel and custom bcache userspace
tools for a while.  I have been rolling my own kernels since 1992.

I presume that eventually all changes will be upstreamed (including the
changes in the on-disk format)?  So, until then, I'll simply rebase bcache-dev
on top of the most recent kernels manually.

I *would* be interested in the new bcache userspace tools though then.
-- 
Stephen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux