Re: Is bcache dead?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 30.10.2014 um 15:15 schrieb Kent Overstreet:
> since 3.15!? shit, I don't think I saw any reports until 3.17 came out...

maybe i'm wrong. Can't guarantee but i already saw it on 3.16.X too.

> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Am 30.10.2014 um 15:09 schrieb Vasiliy Tolstov:
>>> 2014-10-30 15:07 GMT+03:00 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this might be a bit aggressive - sorry for that.
>>>>
>>>> There are a lot of people having deadlocks with bcache_gc and there's no
>>>> dev looking into this since month.
>>>
>>>
>>> As i understand devs provide patches only to next versions of linux.
>>> Now i'm look at dm-cache.... (with lvm frontend lvmcache)
>>
>> no problem but this bug exists since 3.15 and is not fixed in 3.18-rc..
>>
>> Stefan
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux