On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:17:55PM -0700, Peter Kieser wrote: > > On 2014-09-05 2:45 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >Just because a maintainer/developer doesn't want to do anything for the > >stable kernel releases does_NOT_ mean the code is > >"unstable/expreimental" at all. > > These are more bcache-ate-my-data unstable bugs. It's standard practice to > backport fixes that cause instability/data corruption to a 'stable' release > (otherwise, why would it be named 'stable')? That's fine, but it has nothing to do with what sounded like someone wanting to go back and mark an older kernel feature as "unsupported". greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
