Re: Performance testing with bcache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Martin" <amartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sitsofe Wheeler" <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> > > However, if I cat /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/cache/cache_available_percent
> > > before and after performing the read, the value is always 100. Would
> > > using
> > > iflag=direct be better than iflag=nocache in this case? Is there a better
> > > way to force data into the cache for this type of performance
> > > benchmarking?
> > 
> > The amount free isn't as important as the cache hits/misses ratio.
> > Additionally I would recommend reading the TROUBLESHOOTING PERFORMANCE
> > section mentioned above and posting your findings here because the
> > bcache defaults often defeat first attempt synthetic benchmarking...
> 
> Thanks, I will try fio with these recommended steps!
> 
Sitsofe,

Do you have an example fio job file that has worked well for testing bcache?

Thanks,

Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux