Re: [PATCH] mm: Make {,set}page_address() static inline if WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> {,set}page_address() are macros if WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL.
> If !WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL, they're plain C functions.
> 
> If someone calls them with a void *, this pointer is auto-converted to
> struct page * if !WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL, but causes a build failure on
> architectures using WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL (arc, m68k and sparc):

s/sparc/sparc64/

> 
> drivers/md/bcache/bset.c: In function ‘__btree_sort’:
> drivers/md/bcache/bset.c:1190: warning: dereferencing ‘void *’ pointer
> drivers/md/bcache/bset.c:1190: error: request for member ‘virtual’ in something not a structure or union
> 
> Convert them to static inline functions to fix this. There are already
> plenty of  users of struct page members inside <linux/mm.h>, so there's no
> reason to keep them as macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm cringing at the page_address(mempool_alloc(..., GFP_NOIO)) in 
drivers/md/bcache/bset.c, though.  It's relying on that fact that 
mempool_alloc() can never return NULL if __GFP_WAIT but I think this could 
have all been avoided with

	struct page *page = mempool_alloc(state->pool, GFP_NOIO);
	out = page_address(page);

instead of burying the mempool_alloc() in page_address() for what I think 
is cleaner code.  Owell, it fixes the issue.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux