On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:05:37PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > The current git head should be completely fine for production usage - > there's not really anything complicated enough (save the udev stuff, > maybe) to merit tagging a specific version as stable. I suppose > distributions could use some kind of hint that useful changes have gone > in and they should package a new version - anything in particular you > want there? No, it's just that my distribution, Gentoo, only has the option of a stale snapshot from months ago or a live build that just pulls git head. In general, I just like stable software to have tagged releases, so distributions can ship the same stuff. The maintainer of mcelog, for example, doesn't tag releases, and expects distributions to just grab whatever's there the day they package, so there's really no continuity between distributions as far as what you end up with. There doesn't even need to be a tarball packaged or anything, just a simple tag in git identifying a "release" so distributions can package it. Thanks... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html