Re: can't get bache's sequential_cutoff to work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:38:49PM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Mhm works directly on block device but not with XFS on top.

That's odd...

Do you suppose you could look at what blktrace says is going down? If
you could compare what blktrace says is going to the bcache device with
and without XFS, hopefully that'll show what's going wrong...

Only thing I can think of that would cause it is for some reason XFS is
sending bios down in the wrong order... which normally wouldn't be _too_
painful since both the elevator and the disk's cache will reorder the
IOs, so I can see how that would slip by.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux