Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 01/26] block: Fix a buffer overrun in bio_integrity_split()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Kent" == Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> > + *bp->bip1.bip_vec = bip->bip_vec[0];
>> > + *bp->bip2.bip_vec = bip->bip_vec[0];
>> 
>> I think this is horrible.

Yep.


>> Why not introduce bvec pointer in bip (like bio), to cover the case
>> when bvec are not inline.

Kent> That's... exactly what the next patch in the series does.

I'm perfectly ok with a patch that introduces the pointer and fixes the
bio_pair case. As long as that's all it does.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux