RE: Expected Behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 31.08.2012 13:36, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 31.08.2012 04:47, James Harper wrote:
Hi Kent,

I'm going to try and reproduce it myself as well. I just used IOMeter in a Windows DomU with 30 workers, each having an io depth of 256. A *very* heavy workload indeed, but my point was to see if I could break something. Unless the issue is specific to windows causing problems (NTFS or whatever), I'm guessing running fio with 30 jobs and an iodepth of 256 would probably
produce a similar load.

BTW, do you have access to a Xen node for testing?


Does the problem resolve itself after you shut down the windows DomU?
Or only when you reboot the whole Dom0?


Hi There,

I managed to reproduce this again. I have to reboot the entire Dom0
(the physical server) for it to work properly again.

James, are you able to reproduce this? Kent, are there any other
tests/debug output you need from me?


BTW, I was using IOMeter's 'default' Access Specification with the following modifications: 100% random, 66% read, 33% write, and a 2kB size. My bcache is formatted for 512bytes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux