On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:30PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> @@ -422,7 +409,11 @@ void bio_put(struct bio *bio)
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bio->bi_cnt)) {
> bio_disassociate_task(bio);
> bio->bi_next = NULL;
> - bio->bi_destructor(bio);
> +
> + if (bio->bi_pool)
> + bio_free(bio, bio->bi_pool);
> + else
> + bio->bi_destructor(bio);
So, this bi_pool overriding caller specified custom bi_destructor is
rather unusual. I know why it's like that - the patch series is
gradually replacing bi_destructor with bi_pool and removes
bi_destructor eventually, but it would be far better if at least patch
description says why this is unusual like this.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
