Re: bcache on layered devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'd personally use the raid as the backing device but any would work -
you would have duplicates ending up in the cache if you cached the
hard drives directly.

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Piergiorgio Sartor
<piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all again,
>
> I'm not sure if the topic was already discussed here,
> anyway I'll go ahead, sorry if it is a duplication.
>
> I was wondering, in case of layered devices, what would
> be the best layer to use as backing device.
>
> Specifically, I've two HDDs in RAID10 (Linux md driver,
> software RAID), on top of the RAID there are LV partitions.
>
> Obviously, it would be possible to use the RAID components,
> i.e. the HDDs as backing devices, or the RAID itself, or
> the LV partitions (/dev/mapper/VolXXX).
>
> My guess would be to use the LV partitions, since these
> are closer to the filesystem, but, maybe, using the RAID
> or even the single HDDs could be better.
>
> Any idea on the topic? Suggestions & motivations?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance,
>
> bye,
>
> --
>
> piergiorgio
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux