Re: Question on the git repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It should be based on 3.1, I pulled the tree the other day and the
makefile said 3.1.0, and I cleanly applied the 3.1.4 patch.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Joe Landman
<landman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Greetings bcache group
>
>  I've been wanting to try bcache against a 3.2-X kernel, or a 3.1.X kernel.
>  Right now, the repository at git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git
> appears to be based completely on 2.6.35 (looks similar to the bcache bits I
> tested early this year).  Is there a separate code base for 3.1 or 3.x in
> general? Something we could use to generate patches to apply to our kernel
> to build/test?
>
>  Thanks!
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Landman, Ph.D
> Founder and CEO
> Scalable Informatics Inc.
> email: landman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> web  : http://scalableinformatics.com
>       http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
> phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
> fax  : +1 866 888 3112
> cell : +1 734 612 4615
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux