[PATCH 7/7] Don't require latency_warn_ms from bcache_util.o

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When building as a module, we can't see this variable. This removes
useful debugging; probably some restructuring would be better here.

I'm not clear on the responsibilities of bcache.c, vs. bcache_util.c,
there seem to be references in both directions.
---
 block/bcache_util.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bcache_util.c b/block/bcache_util.c
index b014e8c..11a81c0 100644
--- a/block/bcache_util.c
+++ b/block/bcache_util.c
@@ -378,8 +378,6 @@ void closure_put(struct closure *c, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	bool sleeping;
 	int r;
 again:
-	pr_latency(c->wait_time, "%pf", c->fn);
-
 	sleeping = test_bit(__CLOSURE_SLEEPING, &c->flags);
 	r = atomic_dec_return(&c->remaining);
 	smp_mb__after_atomic_dec();
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux