Re: support for physical ramdisk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/19/2011 07:34 PM, Cory Coager wrote:
Sounds great, when will it be ready? ;-)

Well, good question. I've been short funding and thus time for bcache lately; not sure what's happening there just yet.

And there's a bunch of things on my todo list; my main priority has been the code for a bcache specific block device and superblock for the backing device. After that is multiple cache devices, volume management and tiered storage, but there's no set order those and journalling/external journal support need to be done in.


On 01/19/2011 08:27 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Well, ram is more expensive per gigabyte than SSDs, particularly if
you've got something with a battery attached - the idea would be to
use your SSD for buffering 80 gb or so of writes, but then buffer all
of bcache's metadata writes in battery backed-up ram, significantly
decreasing the number of write IOPS to the SSD, and making it so
pretty much all the writes to the SSD are big contiguous writes.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux