Re: encryption and performance penalty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, David Christensen wrote:

p.s. The old-fashioned trick of increasing RAM to improve performance is just as valid today as it ever was. How much RAM do you have in your machine, what is it's capacity, and how much RAM and swap are in use when you are doing your heaviest music work?

This would be my thought too. In general, any project I have done so far uses less than 2.5 G memory. Most modern machines can handle 16GB (I actually have 8)... most of my sessions probably don't need to access the drive while recording/tracking/mixing.

In my opinion, swap should show zero use during audio work. Even with swappiness set to 10 (some set it to 1 or 0) I have not had swap space being used. It is good to have swap enabled though, because if you do get there, at least you can save what you have done. I have found that in an OOM event it seems to be some part of the DE that gets kicked out as having not been used for a while which kills everything. Going into swap will hurt the current take (big time), but the system will at least still be running so whatever can be saved. Lots of snapshots is good too.


--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux