GPL and music (was Re: For your good morning laugh: Fwd: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gerald:
[...]
> The best part: He uses
> the GPL to license the SONG!! Prompted by others that the GPL is
> inadequate for non-software, that is, art material, 
[...]

Why is GPL considered inadequate for non-software ?
I have not yet got an answer to that.

E.g. I have made [1] and that is the result of "compiling" the files
in [2]. The files under [2] is clearly "code", shouldn't the result
be able to have a GPL license ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

[1] http://turkos.aspodata.se/noter/WAMozart/requiem.pdf
[2] http://turkos.aspodata.se/git/musik/WAMozart/requiem/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux