Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Sequencer suggestions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:46:37PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
 
> And with the non-git package you can basically forget to get the patch
> in, it is 'maintained' by speps who basically just sits on tons of
> audio packages without doing anything. This is one 'trusted user' I
> do not trust to close his own zippers. Better just create another
> package, it will be faster by years.
> 
> I just tried to patch the git package but something goes very wrong
> here. I get no error but it looks like the patch isn't applied either
> and I can't get rid of the sed error either. I haven't done this sort of
> thing in years.

The patch is against the AUR phasex package 0.14.97 maintained 
by William Weston.  

If you apply the patch to sources obtained via AUR you need

 makepkg -e -f

without the -e the original sources will be extracted and
overwrite the patch.

Ciao,

-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux