Re: Sound Chip as a synthesizer on Linux. Thoughts, ideas?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> JFTR in the 80s the C64 was more expensive than a PC nowadays is and
> some good analog synth based on CEM/Curtis chips were not more expensive
> than a C64

Today, in my country, the cheapest decent synth is around the $5000 mark (pesos argentinos). This is for novation digitals, analogs start at $8000 if you are lucky.
On the other hand, a yamaha based card is $140 and a c64 is around $700.
In my mind that makes it worthy. Plus the simple architecture (at least simpler than today's computers) makes it lots more accessible to code it in assembler.

> Linux analog synth emulations are better than using a SID integrated to
> the C64.
> Using a C64 nowadays isn't worse the hassle and using it as an analog
> synth never was worth the hassle.

Well, that depends on what you are after. Actually there are at least a few rock bands using commodores, so at least for them it's worth it.

How did you achieve sample playing on a 3 oscillator chip?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux