Re: hardware - Intel CPUs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 06:13:03AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
 
> For an analogue board, small fraction of a millisecond, for a digital 
> board, anybodies guess. A/D and D/A's are essentially pretty quick, but I'd 
> still put most digital boards above a millisecond.

It can be less. This is one of the reasons for using 96 kHz.
If you let the anti-aliasing filters start to roll off well
below the Nyquist rate they can be very short. The latency
is essentially inversely proportional to the width of the
transition band of the filters.

Ciao,

-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux