Re: Advice needed: hardware vendors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, Chris Metzler wrote:

So, I'm looking to find out about hardware vendors.  Specifically, I
want to know about:

1.  folks selling fully-built machines with Linux in mind, so that
there'll be no real worries about any hardware compatibility issues;

2.  folks selling motherboard/processor combos that they test before
shipping to the customer, like Monarch did back when they were still
around and reliable.

In case it matters, I tend to go for as souped-up a home machine as I
can, and then ride it for a long time.  The machine I end up with will
be used for Linux audio, with an Audiofire 8 interface that'll connect
to the machine by Firewire.  So obviously it's going to need to have low
latencies in mind.  It'll also get used for gaming, and for code
development for scientific computing.  I dunno whether it's even an
option anymore, but having one legacy PCI slot around would be nice,
but isn't a dealbreaker if that's just too obsolete.

I am certainly not an expert, but I have learned a few things and tend to build all my machines rather than buy. The first thing to point out is that gaming and low latency are two very different needs. Gaming is well supported, but low latency is not (in any OS). When looking at a cpu for low latency, the cheaper cpu with no hyperthreading will give better low latency all else being equal. Most all in one cpu/gpu/etc chips are not good for low latency (unless something new is any better) because these kind of cpus the extra stuff on the chip steals time from the cpu outside of the OS knowledge/control.

I can't remember where right now, but there is a real time site that has latency results for a lot of mother board cpu combinations, I think I actually got it from someone on this list.

PCI slots seem to have become a problem, they seem to be PCIe bridged slots on most new MB.

A flexable BIOS can be very helpful for getting good low latency performance.

Expect to run your CPU at a lower speed than full for audio work. This can be set on the fly so speed can be ondemand for gaming and set to 70-80% full speed for audio. Many people just set performance mode for audio, but this may make things too hot and the cpu temp sensor may change the cpu speed on you in the middle of your best take giving a glitch. I have found that even running my MB at half speed I get better latency/no xruns as compaired to the faster ondemand setting. The main thing is to force a single speed for audio while not creating too much heat. The MB/CPU manufactures seem to have learned a lot from the overclocking crowd and most new MB effectively over clock all the time and regulate the speed by temperature. We don't want to do that for audio.

Intel GPUs are open but nvidia seem to perform better and Linux drivers are available. The choice here is how close you want to stick to all open SW. I have not heard anything to recomend AMD GPUs and so I have no experience with them either. The intel video on the atom boards are not open and poorly supported, but I didn't think you were buying one of these anyway even though their low latency performance is quite good. (can be anyway)

Firewire ports don't come on MB that I have seen, Make sure you can get an interface that will fit whatever MB you want to use.

--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux