Re: Bitwig: what we can learn from it

[rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@xxxxxxxxx>]

>> I think what we learned in this thread is that the expectations of
>> many [potential] linux audio users does not match the idea that many
>> developers have in mind.

That's not the whole story. Some developers have other goals then users of that project, ok. Users can complain or request features, which devs decline or ignore.

But it's more often the case that a software project offers you a feature and it turns out that it doesn't work in itself or not in the ecosystem of linuxaudio. That ecosystem is often the problem, e.g. plugin not working in a certain host, or in modular environment, one bad behaving client is killing the chain.

We could try to make this part better.

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Robin Gareus <robin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 04/02/2014 05:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:50:29 +0200
> Robin Gareus <robin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Anyway back on subject.
>>
>> I think what we learned in this thread is that the expectations of
>> many [potential] linux audio users does not match the idea that many
>> developers have in mind.
>>
>
> Also, we learn some people think their snobbish opinions about music
> matter.
>

We might be able to do something about the former, the latter is much
harder.

best,
robin

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user