On Sun, March 30, 2014 11:44 am, Joel Roth wrote: > 1. Nama's mastering network. > > +- Low -+ > | | > Master_in --- Eq --+- Mid -+--- Boost -> soundcard/wav_out > | | > +- High + > This was most interesting. I will say I was surprised that the low/mid/high eq is in parallel but do remember that many of the analogue versions do look like parallel circuits too. My question is two (maybe three or four?) fold then. As I had always assumed that these filters would be in series (something about how they are laid out on the desks maybe?) ... How is this done in high end analogue desks? How is this done in the LV2 (etc.) plug-ins? (those with more than one filter in them) If some do it one way over the other, how can I tell which is which without going through code I don't understand? Ardour, nonmixer, jackrack etc. are set up linear, one plugin into the next. So if I want to use a lowpass, highpass and bandpass filter, they will be one after the other. How will this affect the sound? Is one way better than another? will they turnout to have the same effect anyway? This is hard to visualize in my head and more of my experience has been live sound reinforcement than recording. -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
