On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > features new versions of software will provide, not to mention that for > good reasons I prefer Arch over Debian. I'm using both, but the rolling > release Arch is much more stable, than Debian ... A rolling release by its very nature is *not* 'stable'. In the Debian sense, stable does not mean unlikely to crash (although this is a pleasant side effect) but that it will stay the same on a daily basis while still keeping the system updated with security patches. It is my understanding that a rolling release is, by its nature, the complete opposite. -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
