Re: Bitwig 1.0 is out

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 09:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 08:17 +0100, Atte wrote:
> > Are there any drawbacks, issues or considerations vs 32bits?
> 
> There are not really drawbacks, there are just a few exceptions 32-bit
> is needed for, but as you can see, there at least is one
> exception/drawback for 32-bit architecture, you can't run Bitwig.

PS: I forgot to mention multi-arch ;). A 32-bit chroot always was
possible, but nowadays many distros provide multi-arch, IOW 32-bit
architecture for 64-bit installs.

PPS: On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 15:58 -0300, Bruno Gola wrote:
> running it on archlinux (after extracting the .deb with deb2targz)

Thanks for the "deb2targz" hint.

JFTR it's provided by the AUR,
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deb2targz/

I build deb2targz yesterday, but I'm not sure, if I want to spend time
to test Bitwig.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux