Re: progressive time stretch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 23:57:04 schrieb Renato:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:29 +0100
> raf <rmouneyres@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'd recommend to create a tempo map (vs timestreching which would
> > lead to artefacts) As you mention recording in ardour, you could use
> > it to create the tempo map,
> 
> hi, what is a "tempo map" and how do you create it in ardour? couldn't
> find anything about it. I don't want to manually enter single tempo
> changes in ardour

I think he means putting several decreasing tempo markers for your accelerando to ardour's timeline, then re-record hydrogen while both sync to jack transport - then hydrogen should follow ardour's tempo and there would be no need for timestretching...

Edgar

> 
> meanwhile I'm looking into klick, it seems it should work (though can't
> get it to sync to jack transport ATM) - but this way the tempo changes
> will not get recorded into ardour... i.e. every time I press play I
> should also somehow start klick...
> 
> renato
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux