On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 21:05 +0400, Louigi Verona wrote: > The problem is that genuine problems are mixed in with > misunderstanding and things taken out of context. > > No doubt, Linux Audio world is very much distinct from Windows and OS > X. There is something absolutely equal for all of them, OS X, Windows and Linux, they all need a computer. Much of today's rock music is made on analog equipment again. Visit a friends site, not a musician, he writes about music http://www.cosmiclava.com/ . Write to the bands he's writing about and ask them what they use to produce their music. Most use analog tapes, real Mellotrons etc.. Sure, sometimes it's just hype, you don't need an Orange amp, there are other good amps too, anyway, many are open minded, are comfortable with averaged Marshall amps etc. and really, really tried to use the computer for production, but it simply doesn't provide the wanted results. There still are some young, real rock musicians making a living from their music, don't think of all that crap like Metallica, Red Hot Chilly Pappers etc. who don't have any talent for real rock'n'roll. You can't sound like the MC5, Jimi Hendrix, Roky Erickson, old Hawkwind etc. pp. using virtual amps, an OS X, Windows or Linux wha-wha, even a Morley isn't a Cry Baby, perhaps a Ibanez Blubber can replace a Cry Baby. Doing the recording with a hard disc recorder also has got drawbacks, but some young musicians like this real rock'n'roll sound. Not my 2 cents, an objective study. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
