Re: [LAD] Aeolus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 18.09.2013 23:29, schrieb J. Liles:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> 
>> Hello all,
>>
>> It has come to my attention that there are ATM at least two
>> 'forks' of Aeolus. The first by the MuseScore team, the second
>> by one Maurizio Gavioli.
>>
>> Neither of them even had the decency to let me know of their
>> work, and both are taking Aeolus in a direction I do not
>> approve of.
[...]
>> Ciao,
>>
>>
> Respectfully, you granted people the right to fork your code in the first
> place. 

I also see it that way but I also understand Fons. To fork without
telling the author is allowed by license but anyway: it is also allowed
by law to step into a room without answering, if someone says "good
morning". License is one thing, manners are another and both should be
observed.

> Plus, if the forks did/do make any improvements that you value

Looks like they do not ;-)

@Fons: if you do not like the way in that your software is forked, maybe
ask them to use a different name?

just my 2c

HZN

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux