Hi, thanks for the software!
I'm using Lorenz as a modulation source, but it appears that amplitude
decreases greatly as I slow down the rate. Is there a high pass / DC
blocking filter somewhere in there?
Here's my code, in Supercollider:
{SinOsc.ar(freq: 100 * (2 ** LADSPA.ar(1,1774,0.01,1,1,0,100)))}.play
thanks again,
Mark Hadman
On 25 August 2013 01:00, Tim Goetze <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [Fons Adriaensen]
>
>>On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
>>
>>> I'm planning to evade this problem by crossfading between two parallel
>>> static filters. Some phase mismatch issues can probably be expected
>>> when the parameter sweep covers a larger range, but I'm hopeful it
>>> will turn out not to be much of a problem in actual practice, and that
>>> we will find out soon. It really needs a fix.
>>
>>I doubt very much if that will provide a practiacal solution.
>>The state of the filter depends on signal history. Depending
>>on the parameters, this could be quite long.
>
> I think the question deciding the quality of the filter fade is, how
> big will the phase difference between the two filters be? Amplitude
> differences shouldn't matter when we crossfade, as long as we're not
> phase-canceling.
>
> These are very simple filters that don't take long to settle on a
> stable phase relationship. A reasonably small parameter change will
> not change their phase response by much, so my expectation is that
> there will be only little cancellation and the fade thus close to
> imperceptible; at most a slight attenuation of high-frequency content.
> Just theorising over a glass of wine though.
>
>>The simple solution is to smooth the input parameters,
>>limiting their rate of change. Nobody expects an EQ
>>section to change from 100 Hz to 10 kHz in less than
>>half a second (unless it's a synth VCF module, but then
>>you definitely need something else than a biquad).
>
> Yes, that is a very convenient way to solve it, perhaps the preferable
> one given the realities.
>
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
