On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Fero Kiraly <fero.kiraly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I say hallo for Harry ! ;)
Thanks! Your email client seems to mash up things a little: at least, the email I'm replying to is quite garbled here... please send plain text emails in future, and just reply under the text, no need for H: F: etc :)
Also, when pasting output from commands use a "pastebin" like http://pastebin.com/ and provide a link, it makes for easier reading. Thanks!
> I say hallo for Harry ! ;)
Thanks! Your email client seems to mash up things a little: at least, the email I'm replying to is quite garbled here... please send plain text emails in future, and just reply under the text, no need for H: F: etc :)
Also, when pasting output from commands use a "pastebin" like http://pastebin.com/ and provide a link, it makes for easier reading. Thanks!
> <snip>
> H: That's a good start anyway: If I find some time, I'll write a quick post on tuning an Arch system for maximum low-lat RT performance.
> F: appreciated ;)
A lot of your questions will be answered in this post: I'll link it here when it is finished.
> F: oh, great !. it could be an ideal for me. I use various acoustic instruments for live playing, so yes I am talking about less than 4ms
I'm also using soft-synths / effects live, so indeed latency should be minimal. Understood.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
