On 06/05/2013 11:18 PM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier
<nettings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nettings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> it runs fine at 124x4, haven't tried to push the latency down more,
but since it only has outputs, what's the point anyways?
Live performance using MIDI input is a use case.. I'd be intrested what
latencies it can do if you wouldn't mind testing? One of 128 * 2,
128 * 3, 64 * 4 or 64 *3 would probably run best... 64 * 2 would
be amazing for the channel count though :D
On another topic, how would using 2 of these fare for WFS applications?
here be plasma-breathing plutonium dragons with infrared laser eyes.
It would make the cheapest 16 output channel external soundcard that I
know of.. but I fear that the non-sample accurate sync would throw off
source perception?
definitely.
rule of thumb: if you are considering WFS and the price of the
_interface_ is an issue, you don't really want to be doing WFS.
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT
http://stackingdwarves.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
