Il giorno Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:46:01 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 02:33 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > > I'm thinking purely from the point of view of a distribution > > wanting to package this. > > There already was a "Japanese code conversion tool" vs "a Convolution > Engine for JACK" for a while ;). However, for Arch there's also no > package named lisp, but a package maintainer for sure won't call a > media player package lisp. > I agree with you and I'm sure no one will never use the name lisp to package this software, and as a contributor i don't see the problem of it; let me explain. The official name is linux-show-player as you can see on google code homepage, I've just sent a build script to Arch User Repository and it's called linux-show-player(-svn). If you want to launch the program the command is, you guess, linux-show-player. LiSP is an easier to write acronym for documentation, list discussion, bug reporting... I hope this dispute on the name won't affect your opinion on the software itself, and if anyone is willing to propose an alternative great-sounding name I'm sure the main author would consider it ;) -- Asa Marco <aesir.ml@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
