Re: Glitch 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guys, I think it is important we do not wander off into the unpleasant direction of discussing purple elephants. I mean, I think this is not constructive. Let's just focus on Glitch 2, okay?


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:30 PM, hermann meyer <brummer-@xxxxxx> wrote:
Am 12.04.2013 12:02, schrieb Atte:
On 04/12/2013 10:57 AM, hermann meyer wrote:
So you will encourage people to "have no fun" ? :-P

That's one way to look at it :-)

What do *you* think about this? Did I do or write anything wrong? Have *you* got any ideas how we deal with glitch2 problems?

Sorry, No, I haven't try it, nor do I plan to do it, it's simply not my kind of tool.
Just, when you ask for be quiet about issues between close versus open software, I can't resist to make a joke, because at this point there wasn't any sign that the discussion will go in that direction.
The opposite was the case, people try to find solutions to solve the issue with this plug.
And they try first to found the error by there own implementation!!

(so, yes, asking for be patient makes me feel a bit relegated, at this point), . . . ;-)  



--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux