Re: What is the best MP3 encoder?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, April 2, 2013 7:36 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 16:33 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 15:34 +0200, Peder Hedlund wrote:
>> > Your car can probably do 140 mph even though you never go that fast.
>> > Being able to use the card in 192 kHz probably doesn't cost that much
>> > extra for the manufacturer and I guess the marketing department really
>> > loves being able to use it in the advertising.
>>
>> Yes, it's the second sentence :D
>> http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_hdspe_aio.php .

RME has no choice really. If they want their gear to be used to make
bluray sound tracks, they have to support 192k. This is the certification
needed by equipment for that use. True, the sound is not any better than
if the studio used 48k and resampled the finished product to 192k (maybe
worse). but this is not about sound quality or RME doing marketing... it
is Hollywood doing the marketing...

-- 
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux