Am 13.03.2013 02:44, schrieb Brett McCoy: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf > <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Cinelerra can't compare with it, LightWorks is professional software, >> but it does need professional gear, so Cinelerra or even kmenc15 still >> might be better solution for most of us. > > I've found Cinelerra to be very buggy and unstable (crashed a lot). I > used it on a couple of projects but it was not to my taste, I guess. > The workflow and interface was kind of clumsy, too. > > kdenlive is much more usable but seems to suffer from KDE bloat Indeed it may be faster/snappier if it would not integrate all the KDE-Stuff but: the time, when KDEnlive really hang because of being bloatish where over 1.5-2 years ago and it did not crash on me in the last months either. Anyway: KDE ist still much leaner/faster than MSWindows and still leaner than OSX and these are the big beacons of professionality everybody is longing for is it not ;-) Having 8Gig of RAM when you plan to edit AV and a decent entry-level graphics card and audio-interface should be not too rude a requirement nowadays methinks... And I had KDEnlive cutting 2h-videos with hundreds of cuts/transitions, titles etc on a T60 Thinkpad with but 2 Gigs of RAM. In the end I think, if KDEnlive would drop all te "KDE-bloat" and optimize by using basic QT-stuff only, the effect would be hardly recognizable for the user. > and is > laggy, especially for playback. But it's quite similar in workflow to > Sony Vegas. > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
