2013/2/20 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:13:11 +0100, Raffaele Morelli > <raffaele.morelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> 2013/2/20 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Perhaps there are, maybe there aren't, but tiled WMs anyway are useless >>> for >>> a serious audio production GUI workflow, you even don't need a WM, simply >>> use X only, if you like to break a sane workflow. >> >> that's your questionable opinion with some garbage >> first of all tiled WMs (like awesome) can be used in serious audio >> production as you can/cannot use tiling >> the sane workflow is the one which fits to the user > > > I don't want to discuss this nonsense, but I also have written, that for a > minority such WMs might be ok, so don't skew my words. You can't seriously > belief, that such WMs will be good for _common_ workflow in _averaged_ audio > studios. We always read you neverending replies so I guess you can survive to this quite easily :-) Yes I seriously belive that Awesome is really usable in a studio. -r -- L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti, alla protesta violenta e viscerale. (V. Evangelisti) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
