On Sunday 17 February 2013 11:49:06 Joe Hartley wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:36:46 +0800 > > Simon Wise <simonzwise@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 18/02/13 00:22, Len Ovens wrote: > > > On Sun, February 17, 2013 4:00 am, Chris Bannister wrote: > > >> [No need to include me in the reply, I'm subscribed to the list] > > > > > > Unfortunately, this list does not add a replyto: field so the only way > > > of getting things to the list is with reply all.... or spend time > > > messing with all the header fields. > > > > I thought most email clients have supported reply-to-list based on > > List-id for ages? > > It's not so much the mail client as the list settings and the headers it > adds to the email (though some clients are broken with regards to this). > > For me, using the Sylpheed client, a simple reply comes back to the list, > while a reply-all goes to the sender with a cc: to the list, which would > cause the original sender to get the message twice. When replying to a > list, you hardly ever want to reply-all. Nor mally, a simple reply works for me but for some posts, a reply just goes back to the sender. For those, if I catch them, I start again with a reply-all and delete all but the list normally. When I don't catch it, I end up sending driect and not to the list. In those cases, I hopefully catch it later and send again to the list the second time. I have not investigated if this occurs when people cc the list instead of having the mail sent to the list. all the best, drew _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
