Re: Audio distros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:14:12 +0100, david <gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No clue how they'll do. I prefer Debian Sid

I don't know the current state of KDE4, but some time ago I used an older KDE4, not for audio and it was ok. I don't like the design, but the workflow is ok and it had no performance issues.

I want some clear words about break outs in new directions from the distros.

E.g. on Arch it makes me wonder that people using X, need to pull in Wayland. This is like installing init and getting systemd as a dependency. I can live with systemd and perhaps I can live with Wayland, but I won't unclear transitions, that cause issues.

For Ubuntu I guess the direction is clear, they will build a distro with shops, unusable DEs, similar to tablet PC stuff. The users are free to remove Unity and to install another DE, but the DE then will be buggy. My MUA for Quantal already doesn't work anymore.

Debian Sid might be ok, I just have no good feelings regarding to the state "unstable".
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux