Re: So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/10/2013 01:59 AM, gerald.mwangi@xxxxxx wrote:

hi gerald!


<strong disagreement next 5 miles, and likely some alligators crossing>

What sucks: the workflow does not feel organic! Can you say that
bringing down an idea alone with multiple instruments (sequentially
recording all instruments, including synths) to disk is as easy as
recording it with a band on an 8track machine? No!

as someone who has done his share of 8track reel-to-reel recording: BWAHAHAHAHAAAHAAAA.

compare:
* clean and degauss tape heads
* find some empty tape (at something like 90 € per half hour)
* thread the tape
* lay down test tones
* (optional) wrestle with your noise reduction
* level, arm, roll
to:
* start jack
* start ardour with 8-track template
* level, arm, roll

when it comes to editing and mixing, the whole comparison becomes ridiculously unbalanced. and i'm not even talking sound quality yet.

and if you want to include the setup and configuration of a bare-bones machine, then please also include the soldering iron and oscilloscope :)

don't get me wrong, gerald, this isn't meant as personal criticism, and your input is certainly appreciated, but this statement just doesn't hold water.

And just saying that
it is not possible with other OS's is no excuse. The linux audio
experience has to feel like just picking up an instrument (complex
synths included) and a band to jam in the idea.
<snip>
But, and this a big but: as I don't need nor want documentation to get a
tone out of my guitar/ my voice, I don't want documentation to handle
linux audio!

dude. you have practised your guitar for years. at some point, that surely involved reading documentation, or at least very thorough and systematic exploration on your part. if you were to claim that guitars are needlessly complex and you are entitled to just grab one and go, hard-working guitarists would be rightfully offended and laugh at you.

a studio workflow is no different. it takes practice and respect to master. why does everybody and their grandma just assume that when they suck at recording, it must be the studio's fault? that is kind of offending to hard-working recording engineers. ;)

The whole ecosystem has to be integrated and simple to be
operated at the ease of a few clicks with no prior knowledge! To the
same extent as it is open to all.

no. no. no. i don't want to be limited to a three-stringed guitar because people can only count "one, two, many".

stuff that works without prior knowledge or some will to study is usually boring, and ineffective. it's cool for a week, and then you outgrow it.

now i'm all ears when it comes to discussing workflow and how to streamline stuff - after all, professional studio work is all about workflow. but i don't like blanket statements that threaten to make software too simplistic for more demanding work.

best,


jörn


--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487

Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT

http://stackingdwarves.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux