On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Louigi Verona wrote: > However, at this point I would also ask for a need to differentiate between > hobbyist software and commercial software done by professionals. If we > compare Linux Audio Hobbyist (again, simply meaning not a commercial > endeavor, not backed up by capital) with Windows Audio Hobbyist, I wonder > who wins. And that, in a nutshell, explains the reason Dave had that conversation elsewhere. People do not readily admit that they use hobbyist software. In fact, people do not readily use it. People tend to wish honing skills, which is so much easier to do when you have a complex piece of software that you learn step by step. Especially since there are hundreds of books and tutorials, as well as thousands of users in forums to consult with. In other words, users look up to expertise. Not a typical hobbyist feature. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
