On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:52:03AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > You could try zita-a2j instead of alsa-in. On my old 2G P4 machine > > adding 8 channels that way takes 10% CPU. Sound quality is vastly > > better than alsa-in. > > > > it seems as if it may be wise to "replace" alsa_(in|out) with zita-a2j. > what do you think? It would be an improvement. But note that they are written in C++, and depend on two libraries (zita-resampler, zita-alsa-pcmi) which are also C++. I'm _not_ going to support a C rewrite of all of that (or any modified versions). Network versions (i.e. jacktrip but with resampling) will be added, supporting both LAN (multicast) and WAN (TCP) operation. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
