IRQ and RT question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I posted this as a followup to an earlier thread, but I think the traffic buried it. I was eager and curious to hear other's knowledge and experience:

I have an EEEPC 1000HE netbook (used to run Arch but I got tired of having to compile, or failing to compile, some extra pacakges) that runs Xubuntu, usually with XFCE of course, but sometimes with Fluxbox. Also have a bigger laptop, and HP pavilion7, running Mint with Maya Desktop (I also switch it to Fluxbox sometimes).

Anyway, it seems the EEE has suboptimal IRQ hardware settings for RT low latency audio...doing less /proc/interrupts shows that there's a lot of sharing, like the audio and video card being on the same IRQ. Indeed, running Csound FLTK gui interfaces and moving them while processing the csound orchestra sometimes makes pops and crackle dropouts, while the same thing on the better IRQ set HP Pavilion shows flawless performance.

Even if I run an outboard USB audio interface (Lexicon Lambda) on the EEE, there is still suboptimal USB Irq settings to contend with.

I've always suspected IRQ settings, which are unfortunately hard-wired in laptops, to be profoundly influential in RT performance, but I wanted the audio guru programmers to comment. 

Thanks,
AKJ

--
Aaron Krister Johnson
http://www.akjmusic.com
http://www.untwelve.org

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux