On Thu, October 11, 2012 10:46 am, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > On 10/11/2012 01:33 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Paul Davis wrote: >> >>> i agree with a number of your critiques of patrick's approach, but i >>> don't >>> think that criticisms based on the content or design of a web page are >>> anywhere nearly as important as the *potential* content. >>> >>> that's what is missing, for certain categories of musicians, etc. >> >> Speaking of which, you never replied, what kind of (missing for Linux) >> software composers use to create quick soundtracks for TV commissions >> :) >> >> And btw I'm quite concerned about *potential* content. Or, to phrase >> it better, I'm concerned about the ability of the community to >> continuously raise the overall quality bar. > > it sounds a bit lame to say i would do something about it if i only had > the time, but it irks me something awful that all the blender movies > still had their sound done on commercial proprietary audio systems. > > i'm pretty sure with two or three people ganging up on this, we could > come up with a kick-ass movie sound design. and in decent surround, too :) > > maybe for their next movie in 2013... if anyone plans to make a move, > let me know - with half a year of advance notice, i could probably find > time to join. > They are wedded to their sound guy. I think he an Ton are good mates. However maybe you missed that Thomas Vecchione is doing the soundtrack for the new "Tube" open movie project? We are better off learning how to use blender and making our own music videos or movies than hoping for the Blender guys to support Linux Audio. Given the number of very excellent video tutorials available for Blender these days it's becoming embarrassing that we are not producing more AV content. -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
