On 10/10/2012 08:04 PM, J. Liles wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:louigi.verona@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hey fellas!
Would like to present an article I've written. Mostly wrote it to
start a conversation and hear what others have to say on the subject.
http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=linux_progress
<http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=linux_progress>
You can comment here or on my textboard (which does not require
registration).
Seems like a pretty negative outlook overall. Progress has definitely
been slower than many of us would like, but that's understandable
considering that most Linux Audio programs are maintained by single
developers (with lots of other projects) or small groups. I'm surprised
you didn't mention Luppp,
Luppp is, to use the word again, very 'potential' but in early alpha
state afaik. At this point it doesn't seem to be a development where
users can really benefit from.
NON software is a great improvement in the past couple of years. But
also concerning the NON software, it's questionable whether it already
crossed the border of 'ready for production'. Non-mixer seems to be
quite there already. NSM is close, with nsm support in Jalv I think (my)
life will be pretty good. Non-sequencer is a great app for composing and
it's close, but has imo just too many little issues to be able to be
really productive with it. I understand this is a matter of manpower.
A great improvement is the RT kernel being by default in distros like
Debian. SetBfree has a lot of potential too ;)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
