On 10/03/2012 04:23 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Grant <emailgrant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Can anyone point me toward info describing the benefits of netjack2 >> over netjack? >> > > its in the FAQ. > > http://jackaudio.org/faq > > and the wiki > > http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2 > > _NET_jack: http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack2 netjack2 can discover slaves/master automatically (it uses multicast). netjack2 has support for per-port latency which is transmitted between all clients. netjack1 is more robust regarding lost packets - that is usually only of concern if you're sending data over a WAN. AFAIK netjack2 has no support concerning package loss. ciao, robin _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
